© 2020 All Rights Reserved

pH-dependent photoluminescence of nanodiamonds and carbon dots: similarities and differences

Vervald A. M.1, Salekhov A. D.1, Shenderova O. A.2, Dolenko T. A.1

1Faculty of Physics, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

2Adamas Nanotechnologies, Inc., 8100 Brownleigh Dr, Suit 120, Raleigh, NC 27617, USA


Both nanodiamonds (NDs) and carbon dots (CDs) exhibit surface photoluminescence (PL). In combination with their properties such as biocompatibility and high dispersibility, stable photoluminesce provide carbon nanoparticles with broad prospects for their use in biomedicine. However, to successfully control the photoluminescence of nanoparticles, it is necessary to know the mechanisms of their surface PL. It is known that the surface photoluminescence of both NDs [1] and CDs [2] is caused by trap levels created by surface groups. Moreover, in publications [3,4], a hypothesis was put forward that the regions of sp2-hybridized carbon on the diamond surface, an analog of carbon dots, is the main source of NDs’ PL. This hypothesis implies that the photoluminescence mechanisms of NDs and CDs are common, and, as a result, the effects of external factors on PL of both types of carbon nanoparticles must be the same as well.

In this work, we investigated the similarity of the nature of the surface photoluminescence of NDs and CDs. For this purpose, we studied the changes in their photoluminescence properties with a change in the pH values of the environment. It was shown that the PL of both NDs and CDs depends significantly on pH. However, if in the dependences of the PL intensity of carboxylated nanodiamonds on pH there is a single intensity jump with the pH reaches certain values, such dependences for CDs are more complex and significantly depend on a particular sample. The observed differences are due to the difference in the functional groups of the studied nanoparticles. The stability of the diamond core allows additional cleaning and functionalization of the NDs surfaces, impossible for the CDs. As a result, the NDs surface covers are easier to control and more uniform than that of CDs surfaces; carboxyl groups dominating on the surfaces of the studied NDs are only one of the wide variety of surface groups of the studied CDs. Therefore, the mechanisms of the revealed features of the change in the photoluminescence of carboxylated nanodiamonds with a change in pH are only a part of the mechanisms of similar changes in carbon dots.

This study has been supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project 20-32-70150).

[1] Xiao, J., Liu, P., Li, L., & Yang, G. (2015). Fluorescence Origin of Nanodiamonds. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 119(4), 2239–2248. DOI: 10.1021/jp512188x

[2] Shang, J., Ma, L., Li, J., Ai, W., Yu, T., & Gurzadyan, G. G. (2012). The Origin of Fluorescence from Graphene Oxide. Scientific Reports, 2(1). DOI: 10.1038/srep00792

[3] Reineck, P., Lau, D. W. M., Wilson, E. R., Nunn, N., Shenderova, O. A., & Gibson, B. C. (2018). Visible to near-IR fluorescence from single-digit detonation nanodiamonds: excitation wavelength and pH dependence. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2478. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20905-0

[4] Dolenko, T. A., Burikov, S. A., Vervald, A. M., Khomich, A. A., Kudryavtsev, O. S., Shenderova, O. A., & Vlasov, I. I. (2016). Observation of the “Red Edge” Effect in the Luminescence of Water Suspensions of Detonation Nanodiamonds. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 83(2), 294–297. DOI: 10.1007/s10812-016-0284-3

File with abstract


Vervald A. M.
Faculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University


File with report


Ask question